Two questions were asked at DG this week . They led to rather lively discussion during the session, and some alone-time thinking thereafter.
The first was actually the ice-breaker question:
[What is your name]....and what is one thing that you are discontented about?
The "main" question from this week's topical study (we are taking a break from Hosea) was:
Do you think that the gospel should be contextualized to modern culture in order to win more people to the Christian faith?
The two questions were probably not intended to be related. But it did occur to me afterwards they are connected to "needs" at different levels. The first may bring up our (unmet) needs as individuals, and the second has quite a lot to do with the "needs" of modern (and specific) culture and society.
Question 1 : On Discontentment
The answers ranged from the hilarious to the poignant. We were variously discontented about work situations, family pressures, the dismal traffic condition, the lack of storage space at home. We also shared about the more amorphous feelings of discontentment - the lack of previous enthusiasm for things, the "blahness" life on this side of heaven, the loss of the first love of the gospel.
(Sidenote: even though sharing was honest, most were also eager to give thanks at the same time for other things, so the expressions of discontentment did not cause the group to lapse into any sense of despair or disgruntledness. That must be in contrast to many a secularist lunch conversation with colleagues, and a reminder of why it is important to meet God's people regularly.)
But I do think, if we all dared to let our discontentments (trivial or serious) percolate to the bottom of our beings, we would find, as the thinker Pascal says,
"This is our true state.... We sail within a vast sphere, ever drifting in uncertainty, driven from end to end,. When think to attach ourselves to any point and to fasten to it, it wavers and leaves usl and if we follow it, it eludes our grasp, slips past us, and vanishes forever. Nothing stays for us. This is our natural condition, and yet most contrary to our inclination, we burn with desire to find solid ground and an ultimate sure foundation where on to build a tower reaching to the infinite. But our whole groundwork cracks and the earth opens to abysses. (Pascal, Pensee no. 72)"
"Nothing is so insufferable to man as to be completely at rest, without passions, without business, without diversion, without study. He then feels his nothingness, his forlonness, his insufficiency, his dependence, his weakness, his emptiness. There will immediately arise from the depth of his heart weariness, gloom, sadness, fretfulness, vexation and despair. (Pensee no. 131)
This is our condition, no matter how well our circumstances, or how mild a temperament we have developed -i.e. inconstancy, weariness, unrest.
Yet despite this condition, and its attendant miseries, we wish to be happy, and only wish to be happy, and cannot wish not to be so. And we will find the true gems of happiness from time to time - love, beauty, friendship, the good and real things of this world. Our discontentment seldom completely destroys our desire for such things, and yet the discontentment does not go away. Therein lies the paradox of being human.
The truly converted Christian is always the person who must first have known the dreadful existential experience that Pascal describes above. For there is no real "living" without having died this death. It is a critical part of the conversion process that the seeker must feel the dreadfulness of his existential existence and at the same time, the desire and hope to live. Knowledge of the condition, without hope of the other will not get him there. The hope of getting there without the knowledge of his real condition is, according to the bible, futile too. (See Luke 11:44. Ps 41:8-9)
But then, the ten of us sitting around that table on DG are Christians. Why then do we still feel discontent? In fact, it would appear that the Christian might indeed fear the infinite abyss literally more than anything in the world. Why is that so?
I think Soren Kierkegaard's classic essay on "The Sickness Unto Death" explains the real fear, and why we as Christians need not lose hope:
"What the natural man considers horrible -- when he has in this wise enumerated everything and knows nothing more he can mention, this for the Christian is like a jest. Such is the relation between the natural man and the Christian; it is like the relation between a child and a man: what the child shudders at, the man regards as nothing. The child does not know what the dreadful is; this the man knows, and he shudders at it. The child’s imperfection consists, first of all, in not knowing what the dreadful is; and then again, as an implication of this, in shuddering at that which is not dreadful. And so it is also with the natural man, he is ignorant of what the dreadful truly is, yet he is not thereby exempted from shuddering; no, he shudders at that which is not the dreadful: he does not know the true God, but this is not the whole of it, he worships an idol as God. Only the Christian knows what is meant by the sickness unto death. He acquires as a Christian a courage which the natural man does not know -- this courage he acquires by learning fear for the still more dreadful. Such is the way a man always acquires courage; when one fears a greater danger, it is as though the other did not exist. But the dreadful thing the Christian learned to know is "the sickness unto death."
I think what Kierkegaard is saying is that as Christians, we will actually be more and not less conscious of discontentment than the rest of the world, but because of that deep consciousness, it drives us to seek courage in a way and from a source that the world does not know or have. We need not belittle the things in this world that gives us joy, but we also need not feel guilty about feelings of discontentment when these things fail to give us joy. Both the joy and the disappointment is only meant to serve as a driving force to seek the Person who gives real significance to our existence.
The above may then lead us to answer, to quite some extent, the second question of that night.
(to be continued)